You are not logged in.
July 22 (Bloomberg) -- Nintendo Co., the world's biggest maker of handheld game machines, is facing a ban on sales of some controllers for its Wii and GameCube systems after it lost a bid to overturn a $21 million patent-infringement verdict.
U.S. District Judge Ron Clark in Lufkin, Texas, rejected Nintendo's request for a new trial in the case won by closely held Anascape Ltd. of Tyler, Texas. He said that he would stop sales of the Wii Classic Controller, WaveBird controller and Nintendo GameCube. His ban will be put on hold while Nintendo appeals the verdict to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, according to Anascape lawyer Doug Cawley.
The judge, scheduled to issue his ban order tomorrow, said Nintendo will have to post a bond or put royalties in an escrow account to avoid the halt, said Cawley, of McKool Smith in Dallas. The opinion denying a new trial was issued July 18, the same day as the hearing on Anascape's request for an order blocking sales of products found to infringe its patent.
``Nintendo was already planning to appeal this case to the Federal Circuit court,'' Nintendo spokesman Charlie Scibetta said in an e-mailed statement. ``The recent ruling by the trial court does not impact that decision.''
Nunchuk Controller Excluded
Not all controllers were found to infringe the patent. Jurors agreed with Kyoto, Japan-based Nintendo that the rectangular Wii remote, when not used with the Wii Classic, and the ``Nunchuk'' controller attached to the remote don't violate the patent at the heart of the case.
Anascape's patent covers certain configuration of the remote to control six types of motions at the same time. The inventor, Brad Armstrong, spent years developing game controllers in his garage after ``he became fascinated with computers including video games'' in the late 1970s, Cawley said.
Cawley said he argued last week that Anascape was entitled to a ban on the Nintendo controllers because Anascape wants to enter the market and Nintendo has ``clogged the channel.'' Sony Corp., maker of the PlayStation game system, licensed the patent in 2004 and Microsoft Corp., maker of the Xbox 360, settled lawsuit claims on May 1, just before the trial began.
Nintendo said it didn't use Anascape's technology and challenged the patent's validity.
`Sufficient Evidence'
``The trial record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding'' against Nintendo, Clark said in the July 18 ruling. He also said the damage award was ``supported by substantial evidence'' and denied Nintendo's request to lower the amount it was told to pay.
The Wii, a machine that plays games by swinging a motion- sensing controller like a bat, tennis racket or other item, overtook Microsoft Xbox 360 as the leading console in U.S. homes among the latest generation of video-game players.
As of last month, U.S. consumers had purchased almost 10.9 million Wii consoles since the player was introduced in November 2006, passing the Xbox 360, which began selling in 2005, research firm NPD Group Inc. said last week.
The case is Anascape Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp., 06cv158, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas (Lufkin).
SOURCE: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= … _ucYxT3eNw
Looks like there is some trouble in Nintendo, what do you think this will result in?
Discuss.
Offline
ban on controllers? Thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard ![]()
Offline
its all because of money.

Offline
krazywhiteguy310 wrote:
its all because of money.
I bet you if nintendo's wii was not popular this would have not happened, its for money and publicity.
Offline
yup all for money and publicity. someone wants some of the wii action. anytime something gets way to popular people want in on it and fine every way possible to get a little taste of it.

Offline
krazywhiteguy310 wrote:
yup all for money and publicity. someone wants some of the wii action. anytime something gets way to popular people want in on it and fine every way possible to get a little taste of it.
Glad to see we are on the same page.
Offline
why didnt they ever ban card games or pokemon crap?
Offline
yeah lets just ban controllers HOW THE F**K DO WE PLAY OUR GAMES!!
Seems like Anascape wants a free ride
Once again HOW THE F**K DO WE PLAY OUR GAMES!!
Why not just ban every god dam console ever built.
Stupid, stupid and once again......stupid

Offline
they'll start banning CD/DVDs soon, as people can use it as weapons lol
Offline
KinG_Td wrote:
they'll start banning CD/DVDs soon, as people can use it as weapons lol
lol, you mean blue-rays because the DVD's are going to phase out soon. ![]()
Offline
the will be banned for frisbee patent infringment lol

Offline
they'll ban wiimotes cuz it looks like a womans toy ![]()
Offline
Wiibrator anyone lol ![]()

Offline
Klenex will sue Nintendo next because the Wii is the size of a tissue box
Sony will be sued by the NFL because the PS3 from the side looks like a football
Microsoft will be sued by a mason because the XBOX 360 is a brick
Offline
tissue box? It looks more like a standing book lol
Offline
do you guys even realise its because of a patent infringement on the analog sticks... only effects classic controller and gamecube controllers not nunchucks
Offline
sk8mystery23 wrote:
do you guys even realise its because of a patent infringement on the analog sticks... only effects classic controller and gamecube controllers not nunchucks
yea, stupids
Offline
russell wrote:
sk8mystery23 wrote:
do you guys even realise its because of a patent infringement on the analog sticks... only effects classic controller and gamecube controllers not nunchucks
yea, stupids
thx haha i was like wtf are they talking about
Offline
well, my "yea, stupids" was directed at all of them, not you.
Offline
yea i know? i was just saying thanks for the backup
Offline
sk8mystery23 wrote:
do you guys even realise its because of a patent infringement on the analog sticks... only effects classic controller and gamecube controllers not nunchucks
that nunchuck attachment has an analog stick as well.
and if this was a valid claim then why was no one b!tch!ng when PSX,PS2,xbox,N64, and GCN came out? they all had analog stick.
they just want to get into a market that they can't otherwise brake into because they would be an unknown.
@russell
to call people stupid for making lite of what is clearly a money racket is ill stated.
Offline
Code Red wrote:
sk8mystery23 wrote:
do you guys even realise its because of a patent infringement on the analog sticks... only effects classic controller and gamecube controllers not nunchucks
that nunchuck attachment has an analog stick as well.
and if this was a valid claim then why was no one b!tch!ng when PSX,PS2,xbox,N64, and GCN came out? they all had analog stick.
they just want to get into a market that they can't otherwise brake into because they would be an unknown.
@russell
to call people stupid for making lite of what is clearly a money racket is ill stated.
awh no [CENSORED] way i only own two of em! and maybe if you actually read the first post it says the nunchuck was excluded.... yea... so... and the ban is because the analogs were made a certain way or something not because there analog sticks
Offline
It's still about getting free money from a company and nothing more
Offline
KinG_Td wrote:
ban on controllers? Thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard
money makes people stupid and causes losers to sue big companies over stupid s**t... just to make a few bucks...
Offline